A model for innovation in higher education

M. Jakovljevic

Abstract


An extensive research and awareness about the role of innovation at education exist, but insight is missing regarding an individual frame of innovation of how to empower an individual towards life-long innovation activities. There is no adequate model that provides a holistic approach to innovation in academic institutions.

This paper explores multiple innovation issues culminating in the development of a model for innovation from an individual perspective.

This paper argues that awareness and the dynamics of individual innovation is missing in academic environments. Academics’ engagements in innovation endeavours are scarce; there are visible symptoms of deeply embedded social, institutional, cultural and individual factors of innovation. This requires a holistic approach in innovation research.

Awareness of an individual’s potential and his/her innovation development cycles, external and internal dynamics can contribute to multiple innovation sustainability. These are pillars of the ORED model (observation, revelation, exploration, design) and ever expanding cycles for innovation.


Keywords


innovation; model for innovation; higher education; innovation awareness, innovation development cycles

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, I., Omar, R. and Panatik, S.A. 2016. A literature review on personality, creativity and innovative behaviour. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6 (1): 177-182.

Afonso, O., Monteiro, S. and Thompson, M. 2016. A Growth model for the quadruple helix innovation theory. Retrieved 4 December 2016 from http://www.fep.up.pt/investigacao/workingpapers/10.04.22_wp370.pdf.

Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5): 1154-1185.

Amo, B.W. and Kolvereid, L. 2005. Organizational strategy, individual personality and innovation behaviour. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13 (1): 7-19.

Armstrong, l. 2014. Barriers to innovation and change in Higher Education, University of Southern California, TIAA-CREF Institute. Retrieved 28 July 2016 from http//www.tiaa-crefinstitute.org/ pp 1-13.

Badran, I. 2007. Enhancing creativity and Innovation in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32 (5): 573-585.

Bakx, N. 2007. Business Studies. Master’s thesis. Retrieved April 2016 from http://dare.uva.nl/cgi/arno/show.cgi?fid=53286.

Barrick, M.R. and Mount, M.K. 1991. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44 (1): 1-26.

Barron, F. 1968. Creativity and personal freedom. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.

Barron, F. and Harrington, D.M. 1981. Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Reviews Psychology, 32: 439–476.

Bartell, M. 2003. Internationalization of universities: A university culture-based framework. Higher Education, 45: 43-70.

Bedny, G.Z. and Seglin, M.H. 1999. Individual features of personality in the former Soviet Union. Journal of Research in Personality, 33: 546-563.

Berggren, H. and Trägardh, L. 2011. Social trust and radical individualism. In the Nordic way: Shared norms for the new reality, World economic Forum, Davos.

Bourdieu, P. 1989. Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7 (1): 14-25.

Brewer, D. and Tierney, W.G. 2010. Barriers to innovation in U.S. higher education. Paper presented at the conference on Higher Education Innovation at the American Enterprise Institute.

Burkitt, B and Ashton, F. 1996. The birth of the stakeholder society. Critical Social Policy, 16 (49):1-12.

Cervantes, M. 2016. Economics, science and technology policy division, directorate for science, technology and industry, OECD, World Intellectual Properties Organization (WIPO). Retrieved 5 June 2016 from http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/articles_papers.html.

Chen, S.C., Wu, M.C. and Chen, C.H. 2010. Employee’s personality traits, work motivation and innovative behaviour in marine tourism industry. Journal of Service Science and Management, 3 (02): 198.

Christensen, C.M. 1997. The Innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., Caldera, L., and Soares, L. 2011. Disrupting College: How Disruptive Innovation Can Deliver Quality and Affordability to Postsecondary Education. Centre for American Progress and Innosight Institute. Retrieved 3 February 2017 from https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2011/02/08/9034/disrupting-college/.

Collins, J. 2001. Good to great: Why some companies make the leap... and others don’t. New York: Harper Business.

Costa, P.T. and McCrae, R.R. 1985. The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Cusumano, M.A. 2010. Staying power: Six enduring principles for managing strategy and innovation in an uncertain world, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Digman, J. and Inouye, J. 1986. Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1): 116-123.

Digman, J. 1990. Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41:417-440.

Dimitrova, D. and Chen, Y. 2006. Profiling the adopters of e-government information and services: the influence of psychological characteristics, civic mindedness, and information channels. Social Science Computer Review, 24: 172-188.

Engeström, J. 2005. Why some social network services work and others don’t—or: the case for object-cantered sociality. Retrieved 20 October 2008, from http://zengestrom.com/blog/2005/ 04/why_some_social.html.

EU Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. 2013. Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation on the state of art in Europe: responsible research and innovation, Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Feist, G. J. 1998. A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2 (4): 290-309.

Furnham, A. and Bachtiar, V. 2008. Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45 (7): 613-617.

Garrison, D.R. and Kanuka, H. 2004. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in Higher Education. Internet and Higher Education, 7: 95-105.

Geoff, M. 2009. The art of public strategy: Mobilizing power and knowledge for the common good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

George, J.M. and Zhou, J. 2001. When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behaviour: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3): 500-513.

Grief, A. 2016. Family structure, institutions, and growth: the origins and implications of western corporations. Retrieved 8 January 2017 from http://web.stanford.edu/~avner/Greif_Papers/ 2006%20AER%20Families%20and%20Corporations.pdf.

Hage, J. and Meeus, M. 2006. Innovation, science, and institutional change: A research handbook, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hämäläinen, T.J. 2007. Social innovation, structural adjustment and economic performance. In Hämäläinen, T. and Risto Heiskala eds., Social innovations, institutional change and economic performance: Making sense of structural adjustment processes in industrial sectors, regions and societies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Hämäläinen, T. 2013. Towards a sustainable well-being society. Erweco, Helsinki, 2014. ISBN 978-951-563-879-3.

Haynes, C. 2002. Innovations in interdisciplinary teaching. West port, CT, American Council on Education: ORYX.

Heher, A.D. 2006. Return on Investment in Innovation: Implications for Institutions and National Agencies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31: 403-414.

Helliwell, J.F. and Putnam, R.D. 2004. The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 359: 1435-1446.

Hollinsworth, R. 2006. A path-dependent perspective on institutional and organizational factors shaping major scientific discoveries. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jakovljevic, M. 2013. A model of creativity, innovation and invention MCII for entrepreneurial engineers. In Knowledge Management Innovations for Interdisciplinary Education: Organizational Applications, Buckley, S. and Jakovljevic, M., USA: IGI Global Publisher.

Jakovljevic, M. 2016. Criteria for innovation in Higher Education. African Education Review, 2017, [forthcoming].

Jewkes, J., Sawers, D. and Stillerman, R. 1969. The successes of invention. London: MacMillan.

Jones, C. 2010. Interdisciplinary approach - advantages, disadvantages, and the future benefits of interdisciplinary studies. Retrieved 11 Nov 2015 from http://dc.cod.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1121andcontext=essai.

Kahn, M., Vlotman, N., Steyn, C. & van der Schyff, M. (2012). Innovation policy and higher education in South Africa: Addressing the challenge. South African Review of Sociology: 176-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2007.10419174.

Kaplan, D. 2009. The Economics of intellectual property in South Africa, WIPO. Retrieved 12 Nov 2016 from http://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html

King, N. & Anderson, N. 2002. Managing innovation and change: A critical guide for organizations. Thomson, 2nd edition.

Kruss, G. (2005). Harnessing innovation potential? Institutional approaches to industry-higher education research partnerships in South Africa. Industry & Higher Education. HSRC Library: shelf number 3937.

Kruss, G. (2010). Towards dialogue: higher education's role in innovation and social engagement. Review of Education, Skills Development and Innovation (RESDI). HSRC Library: shelf number 6718. Pretoria. South Africa.

Laursen, K. and Salter, A. 2006. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (2): 131-150.

Lubango, L.M. and Pouris, A. 2009. Is patenting activity impeding the academic performance of South Africa University researchers? Technology in Society, Vol xxx: 1-10.

Lubart, T.I. 2001. Models of the creative process: Past, present, and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13: 295-308.

Manzini, S.T. 2012. The national system of innovation concept: An ontological review and critique. S Afr Sci. 108(/9/10), Art. #1038, 7 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajs. V108i9/10.1038.

Martins, E. and Terblanche, F. 2003. Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6 (1): 64-74.

McAdams, D.P. 1995. What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63: 365-396.

McCrae, R.R. and Costa, P.T. 1987. Validation of the five factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 81-90.

McCrae, R.R. and Costa, P.T. 1997. Personality trait structure as human universal. American Psychologist, 52: 509-516.

McLean, L.D. 2005. Organizational culture’s influence on creativity and innovation: A review of the literature and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7: 226-246.

Moses, C., Moses, M., Sithole, X., Blankley, W., Labadarios, D., Makelane, H. and Nkobole, N. 2008. The state of innovation in South Africa: Findings from the South African National Innovation Survey, S Afr J Sci, 108 (7/8): 1-5.

Neethling Brain Instruments. 2000. Retrieved 7 Oct 2016 from www.thewholebrain.com.

Oanda, I.O. 2013. The Development of Higher Education in Africa: Prospects and Challenges. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 21: 69-97.

OECD. 2005. (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). European Commission. Oslo manual. 3rd ed. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2005. Retrieved 6 Octobers 2016 from http://www.oecd.org/.

OECD. 2011. How’s life? Measuring well-being, OECD, Paris.

OECD. 2012. “New approaches to economic challenges – a framework paper”, Note by the Secretary General. Paris, Offer, Avne. Retrieved 7 March 2017 from https://www.oecd.org/general/50452415.pdf.

OECD 2013 Innovation, Higher Education and Research for Development (IHERD) http://oecd.org/sti/innovationhighereducationandresearchdevelopmentiherd.htm

OECD, (2017). Science, technology and innovation: recent policy development in South Africa

www.oecd.org/science/inno/2112129.pdf.

Olakitan, O.O. 2011. An examination of the impact of selected personality traits on the innovative behaviour of entrepreneurs in Nigeria. International Business and Management, 3 (2): 112-121.

Paul, S.A. and Heckscher, C. 2007. Towards collaborative community. In Hecksher, Charles and Paul S. Adler eds., The firm as a collaborative community: Reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Postiglione, G. 2011. The rise of research universities: The Hong Kong University of Science of Technology. In P.G. Altbach and J. Salmi Eds., The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities pp. 63-100. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Pouris, A. and Pouris, A. 2011. Patents and economic development in South Africa: managing intellectual property rights. S. Afr. j. sci., 107 (11-12): 01-10.

Rangaa, M. and Etzkowitz, H. 2016. Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Retrieved 3 May 2016 from http://triplehelix.stanford.edu/images/Triple_Helix_Systems.pdf.

Razak, A. and Saad, M. 2007. The role of universities in the evolution of the Triple Helix culture of innovation network: The case of Malaysia. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 6 (3): 211-225.

Rogers, C. 1961. On Becoming a Person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Rothmann, S. and Coetzer, E.P. 2003. The big five personality dimensions and job performance. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(1): 68-74.

Senker, J. 2016. Tacit knowledge and models of innovation. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Brighton BN1 9RF, UK.

Sharma, M., Kumar, U. and Lalande, L. 2006. Role of university technology transfer offices in university technology commercialization: Case Study of the Carleton University Foundry Program. Journal of Services Research, 6, Special Issue: 109-139.

Shavinina, V.S. 2003. Understanding innovation: Some important issues. London: Elsevier Science.

Shelton, K.A. and Arciszewski, T. 2007. Formal innovation criteria. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology IJCAT, 30 (1/2).

Sherry, L. 2003.Sustainability of innovations. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(3):209-36.

Sibanda, M. 2007. The state of patenting in South Africa. Special Report. Pretoria: Innovation Fund.

Stavridou, A. and Furnham, A. 1996. The relationship between psychoticism, trait-creativity and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(1): 143-153.

Sung, S.Y. and Choi, J.N. 2009. Do big five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behaviour and Personality, 37 (7): 941-956.

United Nations. 2015. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN, 2015).

Utterback, J.M. 2002. The Dynamics of Innovation: in the Internet and the University, London: Aspen Press.

Utterback, J.M. and Abenathy, W.J. 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. OMEGA. The Int. JI of Mgrnt Sci., 3 (6). UK: Pergamon Press.

Varis, T. 2007. Universities and Regional Development: the challenge in the era of the globalisation of higher education. New technologies and innovation in higher education and regional development. Monograph. Retrieved 8 April 2016 from www.uoc.edu.

Wolfradt, U. and Pretz, J.E. 2001. Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15 (4): 297-310.

Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E. and Griffin, R.W. 1993. Towards a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18 (2): 293-321.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/32-4-2432

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


eISSN: 1753-5913

Copyright © 2016 South African Journal of Higher Education

Hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2016.

Creative Commons License -CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Disclaimer:
This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.