A metaphorical approach to higher education engagement as a liminal and creative free space amid supercomplex and paradoxical dual demands

B. du Plooy

Abstract


Amid the “continual pandemonium” (Barnett in Smith, 2000:np) of supercomplex competing imperatives, the burning question about the social relevance and impact of universities has become a significant postmillennial concern in higher education. This article explores some of the associated challenges and dynamics and considers ‘higher education engagement’ (broadly defined to mean any interaction between a university and any of its identified communities, both internal and external) as a liminal space for approachability, collaboration and creation, both within and beyond the traditional structures of higher education institutionalisation and disciplinary and methodological silo’s. The article uses three metaphors of space and placement for integrated paradoxical ‘both-and’ thinking in order to conceptualise and articulate the potential of engagement as a liminal creative free space in higher education today. The metaphors are the shifting fulcrum, the agora and heterotopic anxiety. All three resonate with the ideas of paradoxical simultaneous situatedness (localisation) and mobility (globalisation) amid supercomplexity and boundary-challenging liminality, as inherent qualities of the contemporary academic engagement project and the postmillennial higher education landscape with its associated dual demands of globalisation and localisation.


Keywords


higher education; engagement; supercomplexity; heterotopias; the academic agora

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barnett, R. (1998) Supercomplexity and the University. Social Epistemology. 12(1):43-50.

Barnett. R. (2000a) Realising the University in the Age of Supercomplexity. Milton Keynes, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Barnett, R. (2000b) University Knowledge in an Age of Supercomplexity. Higher Education. 40(4):409-422.

Barnett, R. (2000c) Supercomplexity and the Curriculum. Studies in Higher Education. 25(3):255-265.

Bartholomé, L. (1994) Beyond the Methods Fetish: Towards a Humanising Pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review. 64(2):173-195.

Boyer, EL. (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities for the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Boyer, EL. (1996) the Scholarship of Engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach. 1(1):11-20.

Byrne, JV. (1998) Outreach, Engagement and the Changing Culture of the University. Journal of Public Service and Outreach. 3(2):3-8.

Caputo, J. (1993) On Not Knowing Who We Are: Madness, Hermeneutics, and the Night of Truth in Foucault.In Caputo, J and M Yount (Eds). Foucault and the Critique of Institutions. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Centre for Higher Education Transformation. (1998) the Best in Higher Education. CHET Sunday Times Panel. October 1998. Retrieved on 10 March 2015 from

Http://Chet.Org.Za/Files/CHET%2019




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/31-5-1500

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

eISSN: 1753-5913

Copyright © 2016 South African Journal of Higher Education

Hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2016.

Creative Commons License -CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Disclaimer:
This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.