To teach or not to teach? The question of the academic librarian's pedagogical competencies in the digital age

J. Raju

Abstract


This paper revisits the issue of ‘librarian as teacher’ in the literature and draws empirical evidence on the question of the pedagogical knowledge and skills requirements of academic librarians. A pragmativist paradigm and both quantitative and qualitative philosophical assumptions are used to address this research problem. The paper reports on the outcome of content analysis of academic library job advertisements for professional library and information services positions in South Africa, supported by findings from websites of South African LIS schools and selected data from a 2015 national online survey of academic librarians in South Africa. Such an analysis, framed by Shank and Bell’s (2011, 105) concept of “disruptive innovations” leading to their framework for blended librarianship, is used to ascertain the pedagogical competency requirements of the academic librarian in South Africa in the current digital age. The findings include a list of pedagogical competency requirements for academic librarians and provide a critical narrative, in the context of international trends and the study’s conceptual framing, on the extent to which academic librarians in South Africa meet these requirements.


Keywords


pedagogical competencies; academic librarians; LIS education; digital age; South Africa

Full Text:

PDF

References


Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). 2008. Standards for proficiencies for instruction librarians and coordinators: A practical guide. Chicago: ACRL. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/profstandards.pdf. (accessed 6 September 2016).

Baro, E.E. and V.Z. Godfrey. 2015. Web 2.0, Library 2.0, Librarian 2.0 and the challenges for librarians in Africa: A review of current literature. International Journal of Information Technology and Library Science 4(1): 1-16.

Bell, S.J. and J. Shank. 2004. The blended librarian: A blueprint for redefining the teaching and learning role of academic librarians. College & Research Libraries News, July/August: 372-375.

Biesta, G. 2010. Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2nd ed., ed. A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 95-118. Los Angeles: Sage.

Brecher, D. and K.M. Klipfel. 2014. Education training for instruction librarians. Communication in Information Literacy 8(1): 43-49.

Chiware, E.R.T. 2007. Training librarians for the digital age in African university libraries. Paper presented at the Satellite Meeting: IT [Information Technology] and Research in African University Libraries: Present and Future Trends of the IFLA [International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions] World Library and Information Congress, Durban, South Africa, August 2007. http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla73/satellite1Programme-en.pdf. (accessed 14 July 2016).

Corrall, S. 2010. Educating the academic librarian as a blended professional: A review and case study. http://ira.lib.polyu.edu.hk/bitstream/10397/1731/1/Session1A_Corrall.pdf. (accessed 15 September 2016).

Creswell, J.W. 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.

Davies-Hoffman, K., B. Alvarez, M. Costello and D. Emerson. 2013. Keeping pace with information literacy instruction for the real world: Will MLS programs wake up and smell the LILACs. Communication in Information Literacy 7(1): 9-23.

De Bruyn, T. 2007. Questioning the focus of LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 48(2): 108-115.

Hall, R.A. 2013. Beyond the job ad: Employers and library instruction. College & Research Libraries 71(1): 24-38.

Hensley, M.K. 2015. Improving LIS education in teaching librarians to teach. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2015/Hensley.pdf. (accessed 4 September 2016).

Mathews, J.M. and H. Pardue. 2009. The presence of IT skills sets in librarian position announcements. College & Research Libraries 70(3): 250-257.

Miller, M.J. 2007. Information communication technology infusion in 21st century librarianship: A proposal for a blended core course. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 48(3): 202-217.

Musangi, P.S. 2015. Library 2.0 and the changing landscape of information services in academic libraries in Kenya. International Journal of Library and Information Science 7(10): 183-187. DOI: 10.5897/IJLIS2014.0492.

Neuman, W.L. 2006. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson.

Orme, V. 2008. You will be …: A study of job advertisements to determine employers’ requirements for LIS professionals in the UK in 2007. Library Review 57(8): 619-633. DOI: 10.1108/00242530810899595.

Punch, K.F. 2014. Introduction to social research: Quantitative & qualitative approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.

Author, X. 2014. Knowledge and skills for the digital era academic library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 40: 163-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.02.007.

Author, X. 2015. Curriculum content and delivery: South African LIS education responses to a changing information landscape. In LIS education and research in a dynamic information landscape, ed., C. Bitso and R. Raju, 21-30. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Libraries. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15641/0-7992-2526-6.

Author, X. 2016. Core competencies in LIS education: Professional, generic and personal competencies for the higher education LIS sector. Paper presented at the World Library and Information Congress 82nd IFLA General Conference and Assembly Satellite Meeting Co-organized by the Section on Education and Training and Section on Library Theory and Research, The Conference Centre at OCLC, Dublin, Ohio, USA, 10 August 2016. http://people.ischool.illinois.edu/~weech/IFLA/XX%20XXX---16%20IFLA-Satellite.pdf (2 September 2016).

Riley-Huff, D.A. and J.M. Rholes. 2011. Librarians and technology skills acquisition: Issues and perspectives. Information Technology in Libraries 30(3): 129-140.

Saunders, L. 2015. Education for instruction: A review of LIS education syllabi. The Reference Librarian 56: 1-21.

Shank, J.D. 2006. The blended librarian: A job announcement analysis of the newly emerging position of Instructional Design Librarian. College & Research Libraries 67(6): 515-524.

Shank, J.D. and S. Bell. 2011. Blended librarianship: [Re]envisioning the role of librarian as educator in the digital information age. Reference & User Services Quarterly 51(2): 105-110.

Sinclair, B. 2009. The blended librarian in the learning commons: New skills for the blended librarian. College & Research Libraries News 70(9): 504-516.

Shongwe, M.S. 2015. The information technology influence on LIS job descriptions in South Africa. Information Technology for Development 21(2): 196-204.

Walter, S. 2008. Librarians as teachers: A qualitative enquiry into professional identity. College & Research Libraries 69(1): 51-71.

Westbrock, T. and S. Fabian. 2010. Proficiencies for instruction librarians: Is there still a disconnect between professional education and professional responsibilities? College & Research Libraries 71(6): 569-590.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/31-2-1096

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

eISSN: 1753-5913

Copyright © 2016 South African Journal of Higher Education

Hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2016.

Creative Commons License -CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Disclaimer:
This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.