Effect of Different Cutting Heights of Mechanically Pruned Grapevines cv. Merlot Over Three Consecutive Seasons

M.C. Peppi, E. Kania, R. Talep, P. Castro, G. Reginato


The mechanisation of various vineyard operations reduces production costs and labour requirements, thus allowing for the more efficient management of larger vineyards. However, pruning mechanisation has been associated with yield decline (a decrease in fruit production due to the elongation of the fruiting positions out of the trellis system area), over cropping and unstable yields. Furthermore, manual followup has been a common practice for most vineyards subjected to mechanised pruning. A Merlot vineyard was studied for three consecutive seasons in terms of its vegetative and productive aspects, and hand pruning was compared with mechanised alternating pruning strategies. Bud burst was more successful in hand-pruned vines compared to mechanically pruned vines. However, hand pruning took longer and produced a lower yield compared to mechanical pruning. Traditional high (25 cm above the cordon wire) mechanical pruning showed deteriorating characteristics over time in vegetative and yield parameters.  Vines pruned at a lower height (12 cm above the cordon wire) in one of the three seasons maintained high production. Despite higher yields, fruit soluble solids, pH and titratable acidity were not altered.  The quantity of second-crop fruit from lateral shoots was small and was very similar among treatments.  Mechanical pruning at a lower height in one season in general reduces the annual potential yield, but the average and cumulative effects over the years improve compared to using just  traditional high mechanical pruning. These long-term effects make it feasible to fully mechanise vineyard pruning and maintain high yields. 

Full Text:



Clingeleffer, P.R., 2000. Mechanization of wine and raisin production in Australian vineyards. In: Proceedings of the ASEV 50th Anniversary Annual Meeting, Seattle Washington, U.S.A. Ed J.M. Rantz (American Society for Enology and Viticulture: Davis, Calif.) pp. 165-169.

Di Rienzo J.A., Macchiavelli R., & Casanoves F., 2011. Modelos lineales mixtos: Aplicaciones en InfoStat. 1a Ed, Córdoba. Grupo Infostat. 248 p.

Di Rienzo, J.A., Casanoves, F., Balzarini, M.G., Gonzalez, L., Tablada, M., & Robledo, C.W., 2016. InfoStat versión 2016. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.Available at: http://www.infostat.com.ar

Dokoozlian, N., 2013. The evolution of mechanized vineyard production systems in California. Acta Horticulturae 978, 265-278.

Freeman, B. M. & Cullis, B. R., 1981. Effect of hedge shape for mechanical pruning of vinifera vines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 32, 21-25.

Gatti, M., Civardi, S., Bernizzoni, F. & Poni, S., 2011. Long-term effects on mechanical winter pruning on growth, yield, and grape composition of Barbera grapevines. Am. J. Rnol. Vitic. 62, 199-206.

Howell, G. S., 2001. Sustainable grape productivity and the growth-yield relationship: a review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 52, 165-174.

Keller, M., Mills, L. J., Wample, R., L. & Spayd, S. E., 2004. Crop load management in Concord grapes using different pruning techniques. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 55, 35-50

Intrieri C. & Poni S., 1990. A new integrated approach between training system and mechanical equipment for full mechanization of quality vineyards. In: Proc. 7th Aust. Wine Ind. Techn. Conf., Adelaide, Australia, Eds Williams P.J., Davidson D.M. and Lee T.H. p. 35-50.

Lopes, C., Melicias, J., Aleixo, A., Laureano, O. & de Castro, R., 2000. Effect of mechanical hedge pruning on growth, yield and quality of Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines. Acta Hort. 526, 261-268.

Martínez de Toda, F. & Sancha, J. C., 1999. Long-term effects of simulated mechanical pruning on Grenache vines under drought conditions. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 50, 87-90.

Morris, J. R., 2007. Development and commercialization of a complete vineyard mechanization system. HortTechnology, 17, 411-420.

Morris, J. R. & Cawthon, D. L., 1981. Yield and quality response of Concord grapes (Vitis labrusca L.) to mechanized vine pruning. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 32, 280-282.

Morris, J. R., Cawthon D. L. & Fleming J. W., 1975. Effect of mechanical pruning on yield and quality of ´Concord´grapes. Ark. Farm Res. 24, 12-13.

Poni, S., Bernizzoni, F., Presutto, P. & Rebucci, B., 2004. Performance of Croatina under short-cane mechanical hedging: a successful case of adaptation. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 55, 379-388.

SAG (Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero), 2015. Catastro vitícola nacional. División de protección agrícola y forestall, subdepartamento de viñas, vinos y bebidas alcohólicas. Available at: http://www.sag.cl/content/catastro-viticola-nacional-2015

Terry, D. B. & Kurtural, S. K., 2011. Achieving vine balance of Syrah with mechanical canopy management and regulated deficit irrigation. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 62, 426-437.

Reynolds, A. G., 1988. Response of Okanagan Riesling vines to training system and simulated mechanical pruning. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 39, 205-212 .

Winkler, A.J., Lamouria, L.H., & Abernathy, G.H., 1957. Mechanical grape harvest - problems and progress. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 8, 182–187.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21548/38-2-1609


  • There are currently no refbacks.